# Navigating the No-Code Frontier: Make.com vs. Zapier for Transformative HR Automation

The world of HR and recruiting is in constant flux, propelled by evolving talent demands, the imperative of an exceptional employee experience, and an ever-expanding array of technological possibilities. As the author of *The Automated Recruiter*, I’ve seen firsthand how strategic automation isn’t just a buzzword; it’s the bedrock of competitive advantage for modern HR departments. In this mid-2025 landscape, where efficiency and agility define success, the choice of the right automation tools has become paramount. Two no-code powerhouses, Make.com (formerly Integromat) and Zapier, frequently emerge in discussions about streamlining HR workflows. But when it comes to the nuanced, often complex demands of human resources, which tool truly stands out? Or perhaps, is there a synergistic path forward?

My work as an AI and automation consultant, particularly within the HR and recruiting space, involves helping organizations untangle their operational spaghetti and weave in intelligent automation. Time and again, I encounter leaders grappling with the same fundamental question: “How can we automate without needing a team of developers?” The answer often lies in no-code platforms, and the debate between Make.com and Zapier is where the rubber truly meets the road for many HR professionals looking to move beyond manual drudgery.

This isn’t just about choosing a piece of software; it’s about defining the future state of your HR operations, impacting everything from candidate experience to employee retention and data integrity. Let’s dive deep into a comparison that goes beyond surface-level features, examining how these tools can empower — or constrain — your HR automation strategy.

## The Shifting Landscape of HR: Why Automation is Non-Negotiable

Consider the demands placed on HR in 2025. We’re navigating persistent talent shortages, a heightened focus on diversity and inclusion, the complexities of hybrid work models, and the urgent need to convert raw HR data into actionable strategic insights. HR teams are expected to be strategic partners, not just administrative overhead. Yet, so much of their day is still consumed by repetitive, rule-based tasks: scheduling interviews, sending follow-up emails, updating multiple systems, processing onboarding paperwork, or compiling basic reports.

This is precisely where automation becomes a non-negotiable strategic imperative. By offloading these mundane tasks, HR professionals are freed to focus on what truly matters: building relationships, fostering culture, developing talent, and driving organizational success. My philosophy, detailed in *The Automated Recruiter*, isn’t about replacing humans with machines, but empowering humans *through* machines. No-code tools like Make.com and Zapier are democratizing this empowerment, putting sophisticated automation capabilities directly into the hands of HR and recruiting teams.

They allow us to create seamless candidate journeys, simplify onboarding, ensure data consistency across disparate systems, and ultimately, elevate the entire employee lifecycle. The goal isn’t just to do things faster, but to do them *smarter*, with greater accuracy and a consistent, positive human touch where it counts most.

## Introducing the Powerhouses: Make.com and Zapier

Before we delve into the intricate comparison, let’s establish a foundational understanding of each platform. Both Make.com and Zapier are integration platform as a service (iPaaS) tools designed to connect various web applications and automate workflows without writing a single line of code. They act as digital glue, allowing different software systems to talk to each other and perform actions based on predefined triggers.

**Zapier** has long been the darling of the no-code world, renowned for its user-friendliness and extensive app directory. Its philosophy is rooted in simplicity: “When X happens in App A, do Y in App B.” It’s a linear, trigger-action paradigm that has enabled millions to automate tasks quickly and intuitively. For many HR teams just dipping their toes into automation, Zapier often feels like the natural first step due to its low barrier to entry.

**Make.com**, while perhaps less universally known in the very early days of no-code, has steadily gained a reputation as the more powerful, visually oriented, and flexible alternative. Where Zapier excels in simplicity, Make shines in complexity. Its visual drag-and-drop interface allows users to build intricate “scenarios” that resemble flowcharts, enabling multi-path logic, advanced data manipulation, and more sophisticated error handling. For those who need to build something truly bespoke and robust for their HR operations, Make often becomes the platform of choice.

Both platforms are crucial players in the mid-2025 HR tech stack, serving as the connective tissue between Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS), communication platforms, assessment tools, e-signature solutions, and more. The question isn’t whether to automate, but *how* to automate effectively, and which tool aligns best with your specific HR needs and organizational maturity.

## A Deep Dive into Feature Sets: Head-to-Head for HR Excellence

To truly understand which tool is better suited for various HR automation challenges, we need to dissect their core capabilities. From my consulting vantage point, the choice often hinges on the specific pain points and the desired level of complexity an HR team aims to address.

### Connectivity and Integrations: Bridging the HR Tech Stack

The ability to connect disparate systems is the raison d’être for both platforms. HR operates with a multitude of specialized software, from Workday and SuccessFactors to Greenhouse and Lever, not to mention communication tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, and productivity suites like Google Workspace or Microsoft 365.

* **Zapier:** Boasts an incredibly vast app ecosystem, with connections to over 6,000 applications. Its strength lies in sheer breadth and the ease of connecting standard, widely used apps. If your HR tech stack consists of popular, off-the-shelf solutions, Zapier likely has a pre-built integration, making setup swift. It’s excellent for connecting your ATS to a simple email marketing tool, or your HRIS to a communication channel for automated announcements.
* **Make.com:** While its direct app count might be slightly lower than Zapier’s (though still extensive, in the thousands), Make.com often provides *deeper* integration capabilities. It emphasizes modularity and granular control over API calls and webhooks. This means that if a standard “action” isn’t available for an app, Make often provides the tools to build custom API requests directly within your scenario. This is invaluable when dealing with legacy HR systems, custom-built internal tools, or needing to access very specific data points not exposed by Zapier’s pre-built actions. For example, my clients often use Make to pull highly specific data from an HRIS that an off-the-shelf Zapier integration might not expose, then transform that data before pushing it into another system.

**HR Relevance:** If your primary need is to connect widely adopted HR software for straightforward data transfers (e.g., new candidate in ATS -> add to Google Sheet, new hire in HRIS -> send welcome email), Zapier is a fantastic, quick solution. If you have niche HR tools, require complex data extraction, or need to interact with APIs in a highly customized way, Make.com offers the power and flexibility.

### Workflow Complexity and Logic: Crafting Intelligent HR Processes

HR workflows are rarely linear. Onboarding, for instance, involves conditional steps based on role, location, or department. Recruiting pipelines often branch based on assessment results or interview stages.

* **Zapier:** Operates primarily on a “trigger-action” model. While it supports multi-step Zaps, conditional logic (using “Paths” or “Filters”) tends to be more linear and less visually intuitive for truly complex branching. It’s excellent for workflows like “If candidate status is ‘Hired’, then create a new employee record in HRIS and send an onboarding email.” Its strength is its simplicity; complex logic can quickly become unwieldy to visualize and manage within the Zapier interface.
* **Make.com:** This is where Make truly shines. Its visual scenario builder, resembling a flowchart, allows for incredibly complex, non-linear workflows. You can easily drag and drop modules, connect them with arrows, and build intricate conditional logic (if/then/else), error handling paths, and loops directly into your scenario. This visual approach makes it much easier to design, understand, and troubleshoot multi-branching HR processes, such as a comprehensive onboarding scenario that dynamically assigns tasks to IT, facilities, and managers based on department and location, or a complex talent acquisition process that routes candidates through different assessment phases based on their initial application data. I’ve used Make to build automated workflows that manage an entire contingent workforce hiring process, with different branches for different contract types, all managed from a single visual dashboard.

**HR Relevance:** For simple, sequential HR tasks (e.g., automated email sequences, basic data syncing), Zapier is often sufficient. For sophisticated, multi-stage processes with dynamic decision points, multiple stakeholders, and dependencies (e.g., advanced onboarding, performance management workflows, complex recruitment funnels, integrated offboarding checklists), Make.com offers the robust framework needed.

### Data Handling and Transformation: The Lifeblood of HR Insights

HR data is messy. It lives in different formats across various systems. The ability to clean, reformat, and enrich this data is critical for accurate reporting and strategic decision-making.

* **Zapier:** Provides basic data mapping and formatting options. You can take a field from one app and map it to another, or perform simple text modifications. For more complex transformations, you might need to use “Formatter” steps, but its capabilities are generally limited to straightforward manipulations. If you need to combine data from multiple fields, split strings, or convert data types, Zapier handles the common use cases well.
* **Make.com:** Offers an incredibly powerful suite of data manipulation tools. It includes aggregators (to combine multiple items into one), iterators (to process items one by one from a bundle), array functions, and advanced text/number transformers. This allows HR professionals (or consultants like myself) to perform sophisticated data cleaning, enrichment, and restructuring directly within a scenario. For example, you can take a candidate’s full name, split it into first and last names, check for duplicates against an HRIS, concatenate address fields from an ATS into a single string for a payroll system, or even calculate time differences for SLA tracking. This granular control is essential for ensuring data integrity and creating a “single source of truth” for HR metrics. I often advise clients to use Make for consolidating disparate HR data points into a custom dashboard or a data warehouse, which can then be used for predictive analytics around turnover or talent acquisition bottlenecks.

**HR Relevance:** If your data transformation needs are minimal (e.g., just transferring fields as-is), Zapier is fine. If you routinely deal with inconsistent data formats, need to combine or split data fields, perform complex calculations, or aggregate data from multiple sources before pushing it into a reporting dashboard or another system, Make.com’s data handling capabilities are a game-changer for maintaining data hygiene and unlocking deeper insights.

### User Interface and Learning Curve: Empowering HR Professionals

The best tool is one that your team can actually use effectively. The usability and learning curve significantly impact adoption and return on investment.

* **Zapier:** Is renowned for its intuitive, wizard-driven interface. Creating a Zap feels much like filling out a form, guiding users step-by-step through triggers and actions. This low barrier to entry means HR professionals with minimal technical background can often start automating simple tasks within minutes or hours. The linear design makes it easy to follow the flow of a simple automation.
* **Make.com:** Presents a visual canvas where you build scenarios by dragging and dropping modules and connecting them. This flowchart-like approach, while incredibly powerful, has a steeper learning curve. Understanding how modules interact, how data flows between them, and mastering the various data transformation functions requires more time and mental investment. However, once mastered, it offers unparalleled clarity for complex workflows. My experience tells me that while the initial learning curve is higher, the “aha!” moment with Make.com leads to a much deeper understanding of automation logic and greater empowerment for building robust solutions.

**HR Relevance:** For quick wins and straightforward automations that HR generalists can set up themselves, Zapier is generally easier to adopt. For HR teams with a dedicated automation champion, a strong desire for robust, custom solutions, or access to consulting support (like mine!), Make.com’s initial investment in learning pays dividends in power and flexibility.

### Pricing Models: Budgeting for HR Efficiency

Cost is always a factor, especially when integrating new tools into the HR tech budget. Both platforms offer tiered pricing based on usage.

* **Zapier:** Typically prices based on “tasks” (each action performed in a Zap counts as a task) and “Zaps” (the number of active automations). Higher tiers offer more tasks, multi-step Zaps, and premium app access. For low-volume, simple automations, it can be quite affordable. However, if you have many Zaps running frequently, or dealing with high volumes of data (e.g., thousands of candidates), tasks can add up quickly.
* **Make.com:** Prices based on “operations” (similar to Zapier’s tasks, but often more granular as each module execution counts as an operation) and “data transfer” volume. Make tends to offer a more generous allowance of operations at lower price points compared to Zapier for similar features, especially for complex scenarios. Its pricing model can be more cost-effective for workflows involving significant data processing and numerous internal operations within a single scenario.

**HR Relevance:** For HR departments just starting out with automation and low-volume tasks, Zapier’s introductory tiers might seem appealing. For those with high-volume processes, complex data transformation needs, or a desire for more advanced features, Make.com can often provide more bang for your buck in the long run, even with its steeper learning curve. It’s crucial to estimate your anticipated operations/tasks and data volume carefully when comparing pricing.

## Real-World HR Automation Scenarios: Where Each Tool Shines

Let’s ground this comparison in practical HR applications. From my experience helping organizations implement *The Automated Recruiter*’s principles, here’s where each tool typically finds its niche.

### Streamlining Recruitment Workflows (Candidate Experience Focus)

Recruiting is rife with repetitive tasks that directly impact candidate experience. Timely communication, efficient scheduling, and consistent data updates are paramount.

* **Zapier:** Excellent for basic recruitment automations.
* *Examples:* Automatically send a “Thank You for Applying” email from your communication platform when a new candidate enters your ATS. Add new leads from a LinkedIn Recruiter search to a Google Sheet. Create a calendar invite for an interview once a candidate status changes in your ATS. Send automated reminders for interviewers to submit feedback. Simple, linear, and effective for ensuring basic communication consistency.
* **Make.com:** Shines in complex talent pipeline management and hyper-personalized candidate journeys.
* *Examples:* Orchestrate multi-stage application processing: when a candidate reaches a specific stage in the ATS, trigger an assessment from a third-party tool, and if the score meets criteria, automatically schedule a screening call (using conditional logic to find available slots for multiple recruiters). Parse resume data using an AI tool, then update multiple fields in your ATS and HRIS, conditionally flagging candidates for specific talent pools. Automate personalized drip campaigns based on which job they applied for, their experience level, and their engagement with previous communications. Create dynamic internal dashboards by pulling candidate data from various sources (ATS, interview feedback, assessment platforms) and consolidating it for hiring managers, providing a single source of truth.

### Enhancing Onboarding & Offboarding

The first and last impressions an employee has of your organization are critical. Automation ensures these processes are smooth, compliant, and positive.

* **Zapier:** Good for initiating basic onboarding tasks.
* *Examples:* When a new hire is added to the HRIS, automatically create a welcome task list in a project management tool (e.g., Asana, Trello) for the manager. Send automated reminders for new hire paperwork or benefits enrollment. Notify IT to set up basic accounts.
* **Make.com:** Indispensable for comprehensive, multi-departmental provisioning and complex compliance checks.
* *Examples:* A new hire in the HRIS triggers a master onboarding scenario:
* *Branch 1 (IT):* Create accounts for email, Slack, HRIS, and specific software based on role.
* *Branch 2 (Facilities):* Order equipment, assign desk, print badge.
* *Branch 3 (Payroll):* Initiate necessary forms and send reminders.
* *Branch 4 (Learning & Development):* Assign role-specific training modules via an LMS, with follow-up reminders.
* *Conditional Logic:* If the hire is remote, trigger different IT/Facilities tasks. If it’s a contractor, follow a different compliance path.
* For offboarding, Make can orchestrate account deactivation across all systems, trigger exit interviews, ensure asset retrieval, and manage final payroll processing—all in a coordinated, compliant manner. My consulting projects often involve using Make to build robust offboarding workflows that integrate HR, IT, and legal, minimizing risk and ensuring a smooth transition for departing employees.

### HR Data Management & Reporting

HR generates vast amounts of data. Turning this raw data into strategic insights requires robust integration and transformation capabilities.

* **Zapier:** Useful for simple data transfers.
* *Examples:* Send new employee data from HRIS to a simple timesheet system. Sync basic contact information between your HRIS and an internal directory.
* **Make.com:** A powerhouse for consolidating, cleaning, and preparing HR data for analysis.
* *Examples:* Pull employee engagement survey results from different platforms, normalize the data (e.g., map different rating scales), aggregate responses by department, and push the consolidated, cleaned data into a Google Sheet or directly into a BI tool for creating custom dashboards (e.g., showing retention rates segmented by onboarding experience score, or predicting turnover risk based on various HR data points). This allows for deep analysis that simply isn’t possible with basic linear integrations.

### Employee Experience & Engagement

Beyond hiring and leaving, automation can profoundly impact the day-to-day employee experience, fostering engagement and well-being.

* **Zapier:** Suitable for simple, scheduled engagement initiatives.
* *Examples:* Send automated birthday or work anniversary greetings. Distribute pulse surveys on a recurring schedule. Share company announcements across multiple communication channels simultaneously.
* **Make.com:** Enables highly personalized and responsive employee experience programs.
* *Examples:* When an employee completes a training module in the LMS, trigger a personalized follow-up email with resources or a survey to gauge learning effectiveness. If an employee submits an idea via an internal suggestion box, automatically route it to the relevant department head and provide the employee with an estimated response time. Create complex recognition workflows where peer nominations trigger automated approvals and badge awards. Track employee milestones and proactively offer personalized development opportunities based on career goals documented in the HRIS.

## Strategic Considerations for HR Leaders: Making the Right Choice

Choosing between Make.com and Zapier isn’t just a technical decision; it’s a strategic one with implications for your HR team’s efficiency, scalability, and ability to contribute to the broader organizational mission. Here are the strategic considerations I discuss with my clients:

### Scalability and Future-Proofing

Which tool can grow with your organization’s automation maturity? As HR’s digital transformation evolves, your automation needs will become more sophisticated. Make.com, with its deeper control and more robust logic capabilities, tends to be more future-proof for organizations anticipating a high degree of automation complexity. Zapier is excellent for quick wins, but scaling to hundreds of complex, interconnected workflows might expose its limitations. My advice is always to think three to five years ahead: where do you want your HR automation to be?

### Governance and Security

HR data is sensitive. Data privacy, compliance (GDPR, CCPA), and access control are paramount. Both platforms have robust security measures, but the way you implement and manage your automations impacts your security posture. Make.com’s ability to provide more granular control over API calls and data transformation can be beneficial for ensuring compliance when dealing with highly sensitive data or specific regulatory requirements. Regardless of the tool, a strong internal governance framework for who can create, modify, and monitor automations is essential. In mid-2025, data governance in HR automation is under increasing scrutiny, particularly with new AI regulations emerging.

### Internal Skillset and Support

Assess your team’s technical comfort level. Do you have a “citizen developer” within HR eager to learn powerful new tools, or is the team more comfortable with highly intuitive interfaces?
* **Zapier:** Requires less technical aptitude, making it accessible to a broader range of HR professionals.
* **Make.com:** Benefits from an individual or small team with a logical, problem-solving mindset and a willingness to invest time in learning its intricacies. Leveraging external expertise (like an automation consultant) can significantly accelerate adoption and maximize Make’s potential.

### The ‘Single Source of Truth’ Imperative

Maintaining data integrity across a fragmented HR tech stack is a major challenge. Both tools can contribute to a “single source of truth” by syncing data, but Make.com’s advanced data transformation capabilities make it particularly powerful for harmonizing data from disparate systems into a consistent format for your primary HRIS or data warehouse. This is critical for accurate reporting, predictive analytics, and ensuring a holistic view of your workforce.

### AI Integration

While Make and Zapier aren’t AI platforms themselves, they are crucial conduits for integrating AI into your HR processes. They can:
* **Trigger AI services:** Send data to an AI for sentiment analysis of employee feedback, resume parsing, or predicting flight risk.
* **Receive AI output:** Take the results from an AI model (e.g., recommended learning paths, interview questions, personalized feedback) and automate subsequent actions (e.g., update an HRIS, send an email).
* **Connect AI tools:** Bridge the gap between an emerging AI solution and your existing HR tech stack.

In 2025, the synergy between no-code automation and specialized AI services is where much of the transformative power lies. Both tools can play this role, but Make.com’s flexibility in handling custom API calls makes it a strong choice for integrating with emerging, specialized AI APIs that might not yet have pre-built connectors.

## My Recommendation: It’s Not Always an Either/Or

After years of working with both platforms in various HR contexts, my recommendation is rarely a definitive “choose one and discard the other.” Instead, it’s about strategic deployment based on the specific use case, organizational capabilities, and long-term vision.

* **Lean on Zapier for:**
* **Quick Wins & Simplicity:** When you need to automate straightforward, linear tasks rapidly with minimal learning curve.
* **Broad Connectivity:** When your HR tech stack primarily consists of widely used, popular applications, and you need simple data syncing.
* **Empowering HR Generalists:** For empowering individual HR team members to automate their own repetitive tasks without extensive technical training.
* **Proof of Concept:** To quickly demonstrate the value of automation within your department before investing in more complex tools.

* **Invest in Make.com for:**
* **Complex Workflows:** When your HR processes involve multi-branching logic, dynamic decision-making, and dependencies across multiple systems (e.g., advanced onboarding, recruitment pipelines, compliance workflows).
* **Robust Data Transformation:** When you need to clean, normalize, aggregate, or deeply manipulate data from various HR sources to ensure accuracy and enable sophisticated reporting.
* **Deep Customization & Niche Integrations:** When dealing with legacy systems, custom-built internal tools, or requiring fine-grained control over API interactions.
* **Scalability & Long-Term Strategy:** When you envision HR automation as a core, evolving strategic pillar, and you need a platform that can handle increasing complexity and data volume.
* **Integrating AI:** As the central orchestrator for connecting specialized AI services with your existing HR infrastructure.

Indeed, a hybrid approach can often be the most effective. Use Zapier for all your simple, high-volume automations that don’t require intricate logic or data manipulation. Then, deploy Make.com for the critical, complex workflows that are foundational to your HR operations, require robust error handling, and demand precise data integrity. This allows you to leverage the strengths of each platform, optimizing for both speed of implementation and depth of capability.

## The Human Element Remains Paramount

Ultimately, automation isn’t about replacing the human touch in HR; it’s about amplifying it. The goal of implementing tools like Make.com and Zapier in your HR department, as I emphasize in *The Automated Recruiter*, is to free up your most valuable assets—your people—to focus on strategic initiatives, employee development, culture building, and providing truly meaningful human interactions.

The ‘automated recruiter’ isn’t a robot, but a highly effective human empowered by intelligent systems. By automating the transactional, HR professionals can elevate their role to true strategic partnership, focusing on empathy, leadership, and the unique human challenges that no algorithm can ever fully solve.

## The Path Forward for HR Automation

In the competitive talent landscape of mid-2025, HR departments that embrace strategic automation will be the ones that attract, retain, and develop the best talent. The choice between Make.com and Zapier isn’t a trivial one; it’s a decision that will shape your operational efficiency, data integrity, and ultimately, your ability to deliver exceptional experiences to candidates and employees alike. By understanding their distinct strengths and applying them strategically, HR leaders can embark on a transformative journey towards a more intelligent, efficient, and human-centric future.

If you’re looking for a speaker who doesn’t just talk theory but shows what’s actually working inside HR today, I’d love to be part of your event. I’m available for **keynotes, workshops, breakout sessions, panel discussions, and virtual webinars or masterclasses**. Contact me today!

—

### Suggested JSON-LD for BlogPosting

“`json
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@type”: “BlogPosting”,
“mainEntityOfPage”: {
“@type”: “WebPage”,
“@id”: “https://yourwebsite.com/blog/make-vs-zapier-hr-automation-jeff-arnold”
},
“headline”: “Navigating the No-Code Frontier: Make.com vs. Zapier for Transformative HR Automation”,
“description”: “Jeff Arnold, author of ‘The Automated Recruiter,’ delves into a comprehensive comparison of Make.com and Zapier for HR automation in 2025. Discover which no-code tool is better suited for streamlining recruiting, onboarding, data management, and enhancing employee experience, with practical insights for HR and recruiting leaders.”,
“image”: [
“https://yourwebsite.com/images/jeff-arnold-headshot.jpg”,
“https://yourwebsite.com/images/make-vs-zapier-hr-automation.jpg”
],
“datePublished”: “2025-07-20T08:00:00+08:00”,
“dateModified”: “2025-07-20T09:30:00+08:00”,
“author”: {
“@type”: “Person”,
“name”: “Jeff Arnold”,
“url”: “https://jeff-arnold.com”,
“jobTitle”: “AI & Automation Expert, Professional Speaker, Consultant, Author”,
“alumniOf”: “YourUniversity/IndustryAffiliationIfApplicable”,
“knowsAbout”: “AI, Automation, HR Tech, Recruiting, Digital Transformation, No-Code Platforms”,
“sameAs”: [
“https://linkedin.com/in/jeffarnold”,
“https://twitter.com/jeffarnold”
] },
“publisher”: {
“@type”: “Organization”,
“name”: “Jeff Arnold Consulting”,
“url”: “https://jeff-arnold.com”,
“logo”: {
“@type”: “ImageObject”,
“url”: “https://yourwebsite.com/images/jeff-arnold-logo.png”
}
},
“keywords”: “Make.com for HR, Zapier for HR, HR automation tools, no-code HR, recruiting automation, HR workflow automation, Make vs Zapier HR, best automation for HR, HR tech stack, digital transformation HR, Jeff Arnold, The Automated Recruiter, AI in HR, Automation in Recruiting”,
“articleSection”: [
“HR Automation Strategy”,
“No-Code Tools Comparison”,
“Recruitment Automation”,
“Onboarding Automation”,
“HR Data Management”,
“Employee Experience”
],
“wordCount”: 2500,
“inLanguage”: “en-US”,
“potentialAction”: {
“@type”: “SearchAction”,
“target”: {
“@type”: “EntryPoint”,
“urlTemplate”: “https://yourwebsite.com/search?q={search_term_string}”
},
“queryInput”: “required name=search_term_string”
}
}
“`